As you can see we are now entering the realm of computers
and virtual reality. This is probably one of my favorite subjects there is.
Tons of movies/books have explored the world of virtual reality/computers which
can be enjoyed by many age groups. Some examples include, “Total Recall”, “Spy
Kids”, “Eagle Eye”, “Ender’s Game”, “The Maze Runner”, and a bunch more. This
topic is cool because it can almost always been seen in a negative or positive
light depending on your interpretation. Most of the settings and time periods
involved with computers/virtual reality exemplify a world that’s much more
advanced than the one we live in today. This week I read “Computer Friendly” by
Eileen Gunn and “Burning Chrome” by William Gibson. I have to admit before you
read the rest of this post that I was way more partial to “Computer Friendly”.
Due to that fact this post will probably be more “Computer Friendly” centered
and will touch on “Burning Chrome”.
I think it’s
important to say, before I say anything else, that the way “Burning Chrome”
started was a total offset to me. I understand that not all short stories start
at the “beginning” and that there’s a certain amount you have to infer, but I
hate when the author just throws you into the middle without much explanation,
especially when the concept is as complex as virtual reality/computers. If you
break down the story and try to look at it in its simplest form, it isn’t a bad
story at all, the concept was pretty cool and had great potential to be
interesting. Although, because of the way it was written and how “computer
nerd” it was I wasn’t particularly grabbed by the story. I say computer nerd in
a complex, too hard for me to understand way, not in a derogatory sense. I
really found it interesting how chrome was portrayed as basically untouchable
and impossible to “crack” but Bobby and Jack decided to try and rob her
anyways. Also, I think the concept of Automatic Jack’s robo-arm (bionic is
probably the proper term) is awesome. My review, or critique (whatever you want
to call it), is probably a little bland but like I said I wasn’t all that
captivated by this story. I think this concept would be better portrayed as a
movie or short film.
“Computer Friendly” was a better narrative than “Burning
Chrome” but wasn’t nearly as descriptive. Every story has their own downfall.
That being said, I really thought the way both computers and virtual reality
were depicted in this story was pretty interesting and original. -I may just
think it’s original because I haven’t read anything like it, I’m not sure if
there’s anything similar out there-. The whole testing aspect was what I really
enjoyed and the way it all worked. I think I enjoyed it because now there’s
hope that the future won’t rely on standardized testing that only evaluates
your textbook skills. They tested all aspects of the children’s personalities.
When Elizabeth originally met Sheena and Oginga, I can understand why she was
interested but it was made very clear that she was at a higher level
intellectually than they were. Also, I’m not really sure why Elizabeth didn’t
realize that they were causing her to get in trouble? Or maybe she did and
enjoyed the feeling of deviance? What do you think? Anyways I have to say I was
really disappointed and almost infuriated at the ending. I can understand why
she was trying so hard to protect Sheena because the thought of euthanasia is
pretty awful, especially if you’re seven. I was mostly angry because Chickenheart
just let her give up her mind to living in a computer. She was going to do big
things in life. Even if that’s not what she wanted SHE’S SEVEN, this was way
too big of a decision to make on a whim for someone of any age! This really
irritated me, but on the other side of the coin, also the reason why I have
mixed emotion, based on the way her mother was living, was her future one that
was going to be better for her than the one she chose? I mean her mother barely
ate, was essentially a robot, she could move and exist in the world but only in
her mind. I don’t know, it’s a hard toss up because then you consider if she would’ve
been happier living inside the program. I would really appreciate some input of
opinions on this one and how you interpreted it because the topic just seemed
so unresolved to me. Hopefully in an update I can provide a better
understanding and viewpoint on the subject. That’s science fiction for you.
"What's this, my dear? Do you think you're a timebomb, too?" "I can learn to be a timebomb," said Elizabeth with conviction. And she knew she could, whatever a timebomb was." - Computer Friendly by Eileen Gunn
UPDATE:
UPDATE:
Okay so like I said in my comments, I chose to read “Burning
Chrome” over again for my update in hopes I will understand the story a little
better and can have an appreciation for its writing. I have to say after meticulously
rereading and immense help from my class when we discussed the story, I have a
whole new understanding. I think the part that amazes me most is the intense
and extensive use of metaphors. I mean everything that Gibson wrote was an exaggerated
beautiful metaphor for something that was so simple. For example in the very beginning
Gibson writes “A silver tide of phosphenes boiled across my field of vision as
the matrix began to unfold in my head, a 3-D chessboard, infinite and perfectly
transparent.” The only think actually happening in the story at this point was
that the program was booting up when they put it in the computer. Somehow
Gibson made something so simple into something so beautiful, as he does this
throughout the entire story. It’s very clear when you break down the story to
its core that nothing all that special is going on. Basically, there is a love
triangle who is also trying to get away with a big steal from chrome. There’s
nothing all that crazy going on but the way Gibson manages to transforms the
words and statements into something beautiful is why this story is special and
impactful.
It's interesting that you didn't respond to "Burning Chrome." I'm by no means fluent in computer/programming slang, but I find it one of the most beautiful stories ever written. The use of language is exquisite, and there are lines that absolutely slay me. Listen to the music of: Bobby was a cowboy. Bobby was a cracksman, a burglar, a casing mankind's extended electronic nervous system, rustling data and credit in the crowded matrix, monochrome nonspace where the only stars are dense concentrations of information, and high above it all burn corporate galaxies and the cold spiral arms of military systems.
ReplyDeleteIt's lyrical in its rhythm and use of poetic tricks like assonance, and then the imagery of cowboys and universes and how he uses them as metaphors. . .I just think this guy is a genius.
Okay, so now that you've broken this down for me a little better, I think it's pretty clear for me to see that I've absolutely missed the value and true form of this piece. I think for my update I'm going to go back and try to read it again going into it with this mindset and see what I can get from it a second time around.
DeleteI appreciate that you revisited the story after the class discussion!
ReplyDelete