I absolutely LOVE both of these pieces of work. Although it
states in the opening credits of “Total Recall” that it was based on the story “We
Can Remember It for You Wholesale” I don’t really think that’s accurate. I
think it would be better off stated that the ideas for the movie were adapted from the story. I say this because
yes, the whole concept of “Recall” and the aspect of him waking up is pretty
much the same but, after he leaves the office everything is different. That
being said I do think that the story was a little more plausible and realistic
than the movie. However, the movie is super cool and I understand that in order
to make it interesting and enticing they had to create a more intense plot
line. Along with the movie being more interesting, a huge part of those efforts
was the casting of Arnold Schwarzenegger. I do think that this was a good call
by the writers because he adds this whole other element to the story all
together. In the story the man seemed kind of average and plain but you won’t
expect that of an ex-secret agent. I think giving the movie some star power and
an actor who is pretty bad-ass it made viewers want to see the movie more and
like I said add that extra layer of character depth. (Also let’s not forget
Arnold’s wild ability to pull of those corny one-liners)
I want to address the notion that artificial memories can be
implanted into your mind. To me I think that is highly implausible. The human
brain is one of the most unexplained objects in our known universe. We still
struggle to do brain surgery to fix little things without messing up a key part
of someone’s existence. I’d also like to point out how prominent of a disease
Alzheimer’s is right now. Doctors and scientists still don’t even know how the
disease is caused directly, why/how it progresses, and how it can be
stopped/reversed. I think that it would be an amazing thing to have considering
these problems and it would mean huge technological advances in the medical
field. I think that if this became a regular, casual thing, there would be a
lot of room for error and the risks would be too high. If those risk were
reduced I still don’t think I could see the ethical benefit in all of this. I
guess it could make people’s lives easier in a way but even then, there is
something to be said about real things versus artificial things. I think this
is true in all aspects that the original is always better than the artificial.
If artificial memories were available, it would not be something I’d
participate in.
“He awoke-and wanted Mars. The valleys, he thought. What would
it be like to trudge among them? Great and greater yet: the dream grew as he
because fully conscious, the dream and the yearning. He could almost feel the
enveloping presence of the other world, which only government agents and high
officials had seen.” – “We Can Remember It for You Wholesale” Philip K. Dick
Sarah, I enjoyed reading your blog. I, too, fell the same way. As I said in Ryan's blog, the story was good, but very vanilla, in my honest opinion. Yes, you can't get a book and movie to be100% the same, as you said, "They had to exaggerate" to make more appealing to the crowd. With that being said, though, I do feel they also explained some points in the book that was not in the movie, almost like a deleted scene. In the original Total Recall, they never talked about how the Government was able to communicate with Quail via consciousness.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI also enjoyed reading your perspective on the movie/short story and memory implantation. I felt a different approach as far as memory implantation, although, MEDICALLY, I suppose for diseases such as Alzheimer's it could pose many benefits I agree wholeheartedly that I, as well would not be participating in them. Like I stated in my own blog, memories make us who we are. But it makes me question, would that also mean we could take someone with a violent, disturbing past (such as a serial killer, for instance) and turn him/her into a kindhearted, selfless individual or would their previous personality resurface just as it had in both the movie and short story for Doug Quaid(l)? And I have to disagree on the choice of Arnold for Doug, I think his acting is terrible and the accent is ghastly, but I suppose that's my personal opinion. I would've liked to see Bruce Willis play the role of Doug. I felt Bruce did great in The Fifth Element and he does a good job at portraying both family man and bad-ass.
ReplyDelete